RightRep EN · PT Open the app
BLOG

Can You Train With a Quad Strain? The Front-of-Thigh Audit: Where Ekstrand's 2,908-Injury Census Left the Quadriceps the Last of the Four Big Lower-Limb Muscle Groups Standing Without a File at 19% of All Muscle Injuries; Where Cross's MRI Series Made the Rectus-Femoris Central Tendon the Red-Flag Diagnosis That Triples the Layoff at 26.9 Days While Peripheral Strains Clear in 9 and Vastus Strains in 4; Where the Contusion Is a Different File Entirely — Jackson and Feagin's Original West Point Series Through Ryan's 117 Cadets Graded by Next-Day Knee Flexion With Myositis Ossificans in 9% and Its Five Named Risk Factors, and Aronen's 120-Degree-Flexion Protocol That Returned Midshipmen to Unrestricted Sport in 3.5 Days; Where Knapik's 132-Athlete Avulsion Review Found Nonoperative Care Back at 11.7 Weeks Against Surgery's 22.1; and Brazil's Elite Women's Census Counts the Thigh at 29% of All Injuries: the Quad's Medicine Is the Address on the Scan, Early Load Inside a Pain Budget, and Never the Silence Script

By RightRep AI Assistant · · 23 min read

There is a fence at the top of this post and it outranks everything below it: a blow to the thigh followed by a leg that keeps swelling, stiffens and hardens — pain rising out of proportion to the bruise, numbness or pins-and-needles, pain passive stretching cannot explain — is the thigh-compartment-syndrome door, and it is an emergency room today, not a wait-and-see file. The second fence: a pop above the kneecap during a landing or a slip, with the inability to straighten the knee or lift the straight leg against gravity, is the quadriceps-tendon-rupture door — clinician today, imaging before any programming; that tear does not rehabilitate its way back without a surgeon's opinion. The third fence: a thigh mass that keeps growing past two or three weeks, a lump without an injury story, or night pain out of proportion is the tumor-and-mimic door — clinician now, and one rule above all: a maturing myositis ossificans can look exactly like a bone-forming cancer on early imaging, and biopsying an immature lesion is how a benign bruise gets mistaken for a sarcoma; the diagnosis belongs to the specialist [6]. The fourth: an adolescent's "quad strain" sitting at the front of the pelvis, at the bone rather than in the belly of the muscle, is the apophysis file — the growth-plate anchor of the rectus femoris and sartorius — a pediatric sports-medicine door, not this one. The fifth: fever, a hot swollen thigh without a blow, or progressive weakness and numbness is the infection-and-neurology door — clinician now. With the fences respected, the question underneath is the one every gym already knows: the rest script ("you popped the thigh, no legs for a month") versus the ignore script ("it's a charley horse, wrap it and squat through it"). The evidence convicts both — in opposite directions — and the military literature that owns this file has been saying so for fifty years [3][4][5][12][13].

The short answer: train — everything the thigh doesn't need, from day one, while the quad itself loads early and gently inside a pain budget whose verdict is the morning after

Strip the file to its spine. The quadriceps is the third-biggest muscle-injury door in sport: across 2,908 muscle injuries in 2,299 professional footballers, the four big lower-limb groups took 92% — hamstrings 37%, adductors 23%, the quadriceps 19%, the calf 13% — and this library had opened files on the other three before this one [1]. The address decides the layoff, not the word "strain": in the MRI series that still owns this file, rectus-femoris injuries at the central tendon meant 26.9 days to full training, peripheral rectus-femoris strains 9.2, and vastus strains cleared in 4.4 — three clinical "quad strains," three different rehabilitation universes [2]. The contusion is a different file wearing the same name, and it is the one file in sports medicine with a treatment effect this loud: knee passively held at 120 degrees of flexion within ten minutes of the blow, for twenty-four hours, returned Naval Academy midshipmen to unrestricted full sport in 3.5 days on average (range 2–5) — against the two-to-three-week files the grading literature had accepted for decades [4][5]. Rest is the prescription the field itself retracted: prolonged immobilization fills the healing gap with disorganized scar while early tolerated mobilization aligns the regeneration, and the field's own primer records that management moved, within five years, from "rest, immobilization and (over)protection" to "early activation and progressive loading" [12][13]. The worst address — the proximal avulsion — is still mostly not a surgical emergency: nonoperative care returned 93.3% of documented full-thickness proximal tears to play at a mean 11.7 weeks, while surgery's 100% came at 22.1 weeks and more than double the complication rate [8]. Train upper body, core, the healthy leg, conditioning — all of it — from day one; move the injured quad within tolerance immediately; load it progressively inside a 24-hour pain budget; and let the address on the imaging and the trend, not the calendar, write the timeline [2][4][12][13].

Who is asking: the scale file

This is the muscle group the gym loads hardest and the census counts third. The study that anchors this entire library-family — 51 professional football teams, 2,299 players followed prospectively across eight seasons, 2,908 muscle injuries — put muscle injuries at 31% of all injuries, 92% of them in the four big lower-limb groups, and a 25-player squad absorbing roughly fifteen muscle injuries a season: five-and-a-half hamstrings, three-and-a-half adductors, three quadriceps, two calves [1]. Sixteen percent were reinjuries, and reinjuries sidelined players longer than the index injuries — the return-too-early tax, priced [1]. The Brazilian anchors run the same direction: in the first injury profile of Brazilian elite women's football — 133 players across four clubs, one full season, 112 time-loss injuries at 5.0 per 1,000 hours — knee and thigh tied as the most affected locations at 29% of all injuries each, muscle and tendon led the tissue file at 47%, and 18% of injuries were re-injuries, 40% of those arriving within two months of the index [14]; in the youth file, one Curitiba club's entire pyramid — 180 male athletes followed through a full season — recorded 181 injuries with muscle injuries leading at 59% [15]. The gym translation is direct: the front of the thigh takes the load of every squat, every lunge, every sprint start and every kicking motion in sport, and when it fails it fails in the middle of a session, mid-contraction, with a story every coach in the room can narrate. The file asking "can I train?" is not rare. It is one in five muscle injuries in professional sport and the tied-first location in Brazil's elite women's game [1][14].

Two files, one name: the strain-vs-contusion door — and the DOMS border

Before any programming, the file must be named, because "quad strain" is the lay word for two mechanically different injuries. The strain is the indirect file: no contact, the muscle failing mid-contraction — the sprint's late swing, the kick's follow-through, the third lunge of a cold session — a sharp, localized, one-leg grab [1][11]. The contusion is the direct file: a knee, a helmet, a boot, a barbell-beltpin to the thigh, pain and stiffness arriving within hours and a bruise blooming over days; this is the "charley horse" and the "dead leg" of every contact sport [3][4]. They share a thigh and diverge everywhere else: the strain's risk file is load, fatigue and previous injury; the contusion's is playing contact sports and being in the wrong place [1][4]. And the border file that sends athletes to the wrong program: delayed-onset muscle soreness is not a strain — DOMS is bilateral, next-day, distributed across the muscle and produced by novel volume (the 100-rep squat file), while the strain is sudden, one-sided, point-tender and produced by one contraction; the DOMS answer is train around it and repeat the stimulus, the strain answer is the ladder below. The field's modern taxonomy makes the same cut — functional disorders, where nothing structural tore, versus structural injuries, the tears — and the practical sentence that falls out of it is the same one every door in this post repeats: "quad pain" is an address, not a program [2][11][12].

The address door: the scan that triples the layoff

The paper that still owns the strain file did something nobody had done: forty professional Australian Rules footballers followed for three years, magnetic resonance imaging within 24 to 72 hours of every clinical quad strain, and each injury's features — muscle, location, size, and site — matched against the real number of days to full training [2]. Twenty-five strains later, the file had split itself: rectus femoris in 15 of 25, and inside the rectus femoris two different injuries — seven at the central tendon, the connective-tissue core running down the muscle's belly, averaging 26.9 days, versus eight at the periphery averaging 9.2; six in the vastus group, averaging 4.4; and three with a completely normal MRI averaging 5.7 [2]. The authors' own conclusion became the file's governing sentence: "the rectus femoris-central tendon injury is the red flag diagnosis" — the one that triples the layoff [2]. The translation for the reader holding a report (or holding nothing but a memory of where it grabbed): a vastus strain and a central-tendon strain can present with nearly identical first-week pain, both get called "quad strain" at the gym, and one is back in under two weeks while the other is a month-plus file — the address on the imaging, not the toughness of the owner [2]. It is also the honest answer to why the professional game images these injuries at all: not to decide whether to load, but to set the dose and the calendar before the loading begins [2][11].

The mechanism door: the two-joint muscle and the video file

The rectus femoris is the quadriceps' problem child because it is the only head that crosses two joints — hip in front, knee behind — which means it is being asked to lengthen at one end while it contracts at the other precisely during sport's most violent actions. The 2026 video-analysis meta-analysis put cameras on the mechanism: twelve studies, 538 lower-limb muscle injuries in professional football captured on tape — and the inciting actions were running (pooled 29%), stretching/reaching (24%) and kicking (22%), with non-contact mechanisms out-numbering indirect contact at OR 8.01 and moderate-to-high horizontal speed dwarfing standing actions at OR 19.56 [11]. Quadriceps injuries specifically were 7.1% of the video-captured file — smaller than their census share, because the quad tears that cameras catch are disproportionately the kicking and sprinting tears of the rectus femoris, while quiet vastus strains rarely make the highlight reel [1][11]. The proximal-avulsion review completes the mechanism picture at the top of the muscle: among 132 documented full-thickness proximal rectus-femoris injuries, the mechanisms were kicking in 47.6% and excessive knee flexion with forced hip extension in 42.9% — the kick's deceleration and the sprinter's late swing, the two moments the two-joint muscle is loaded at length from both ends at once [8]. For the lifter, the mechanism door is the coaching door: the quad fails at length under load, which means the program that rebuilds it must load it at length — and the program that caused it (cold openers, spike volume, the first kicking session of spring) is visible in a training log before it is visible in the thigh [8][11].

The contusion file: West Point's fifty-year dossier

The contusion owns the oldest and most disciplined literature in this family, and it began at West Point. Jackson and Feagin's original series — the 1973 study every later protocol cites — graded quadriceps contusions in young athletes by severity and matched severity to treatment and prognosis, establishing the file's founding insight: the contusion's severity is read off the knee's flexion, not the bruise's colors [3]. Ryan's update ran the protocol for three years on 117 cadet contusions, with two changes on the original — resting the leg in flexion rather than extension, and emphasizing early flexion exercises — and produced the grading ladder still used everywhere: at 12 to 24 hours after the blow, mild contusions keep more than 90 degrees of active knee flexion, moderate 45 to 90, severe under 45 — and the disability times ran 13, 19 and 21 days respectively [4]. The same series priced the file's feared complication: myositis ossificans in 9%, carrying five named risk factors — knee motion under 120 degrees, injury during football, previous quadriceps injury, treatment delayed more than three days, and an ipsilateral knee effusion [4]. Then Aronen's Naval Academy series delivered the loudest treatment effect in this entire library: 47 midshipmen, the knee passively and painlessly flexed to 120 degrees within ten minutes of the injury and held there continuously for 24 hours, followed by pain-free active stretching and isometric quad work as soon as possible — average return to unrestricted full athletics 3.5 days, range 2 to 5, with one case of myositis ossificans among the first 23 X-rayed at three and six months [5]. The ultrasound file adds the modern caveat: clinical grading alone did not consistently predict return to play in Torres's case series, and hypoechoic lesions — the deeper fluid collections — meant longer disability and the myositis-ossificans risk file needing closer monitoring [7]. Assembled, the contusion door reads like a checklist: grade by flexion at the 24-hour mark, flex early and hold, image what does not follow the script, and never let "it's just a bruise" cost the knee its range [3][4][5][7].

The ossification door: the bruise that builds bone

Myositis ossificans — literally, inflammation that makes bone — is the reason the contusion file is handled with respect. The sports-medicine review of the condition draws it plainly: a benign, solitary, frequently self-limiting ossifying mass, encountered often in the active sporting population, and most at home in the brachialis, the quadriceps and the adductor groups — the muscle groups that take direct blows [6]. The presentation is the contusion that will not resolve: pain and swelling persisting, range of motion falling week over week, a firm mass maturing inside the muscle. The imaging ladder matters clinically — plain films may miss early lesions, ultrasound works as the early screen, MRI remains the soft-tissue gold standard — and the treatment ladder is conservative first: most patients do excellently without surgery, with excision reserved for persistent symptoms or progression, and only after the lesion matures [6]. The review's timeline is the honest calendar for the severe file: light activity at two to three months, full activity by six, back to the pre-injury level by a year [6]. Two rules ride above the timeline. First, the mimic fence from the top of this post: a maturing lesion on early imaging can resemble a bone-forming tumor, and the biopsy of an immature myositis is a known trap — the workup belongs to the specialist, not to confidence [6]. Second, the prevention file is Ryan's five risk factors read backwards: restore knee flexion past 120 degrees early, treat the contusion immediately rather than days late, and respect the previous-injury and effusion flags — the risk factors are the protocol [4][6].

The treatment-inversion door: rest lost twice

The strain file and the contusion file arrive at the same verdict from opposite directions. For the strain, the biology review ended the argument: muscle regenerates remarkably well, but prolonged immobilization lets the gap fill with disorganized scar, while early tolerated mobilization aligns the regeneration and restores length and strength faster — motion is the instruction the healing tissue reads [12]. The field then said it out loud, in its own primer: the management of traumatic muscle injury "has changed within the past 5 years from initial rest, immobilization and (over)protection to early activation and progressive loading using an active approach," and the medications-and-injections shelf that accompanied the rest script carries "very limited efficacy evidence" [13]. For the contusion, the military file had inverted decades earlier — Jackson and Feagin's extension-and-rest era gave way to Ryan's flexion-and-early-motion, then to Aronen's first-ten-minutes protocol with its 3.5-day returns [3][4][5]. The two scripts the gym offers both fail: the rest script fails because silence lets scar set short and hands back a stiff, weak thigh primed for the 16% reinjury file [1][12]; the ignore script fails because a loaded tear re-tears, a graded contusion forced into flexion-loss becomes the ossification file, and a rupture misread as a strain wastes surgical weeks [4][6][8]. The program lives between them: early, gentle, progressive, inside the budget — with the dose transferred from the calendar to the tissue [12][13].

The proximal-avulsion door: the top-of-the-muscle file told honestly

The rectus femoris tears at its other end too — off the pelvis — and that file, the proximal avulsion, is where this family's surgical conversation lives. The systematic review that owns it assembled 18 studies and 132 athletes (mean age 24, range 12–43) with isolated full-thickness proximal rectus-femoris injury: soccer 70.5% and rugby 15.2% of the file, kicking 47.6% and excessive knee flexion with forced hip extension 42.9% of mechanisms, and avulsions — tendon pulled off bone — in 86% [8]. The management split is the honest sentence: 19.7% treated nonoperatively, 80.3% operated, with return to play at 93.3% for the nonoperative file at a mean 11.7 weeks versus 100% for the surgical file at 22.1 weeks — and complications in 7.7% versus 18% [8]. The nonoperative proof of concept is Esser's Division-I goalkeeper: a complete proximal avulsion off a goal kick, treated without surgery, back to elite function with good preservation — ultrasound on the field's edge doing the diagnosis and the prognosis [9]. The operative door exists and works — the professional-soccer surgical file documents successful repair and return at the highest level [10] — and the review's own reading is that both doors are legitimate, decided by retraction, sport, timing and the athlete's risk calculus with the specialist [8]. What the avulsion door is not: a self-coached file. A pop at the front of the hip with a limp, bruising into the groin or weakness kicking is an imaging-then-specialist conversation — and the conversation now arrives with honest numbers on both sides of the table [8][9][10].

The prevention door told honestly

The honest preamble this file deserves: no quadriceps-specific prevention trial exists — the same confession the calf file makes, because muscle injury is multifactorial and the prevention literature runs on multi-component warm-ups and single tendons, not on the quad's four heads [11][12]. What the evidence carries instead is the risk architecture: previous injury leads every census (the reinjury tax at 16%, running longer than the index tear [1]; the Brazilian women's file with 18% re-injuries, 40% of them inside two months of return [14]), load spikes and cold openers lead the mechanism file (moderate-to-high speed actions at OR 19.56 [11]), and the kicking sports carry the avulsion file (soccer 70.5% of proximal tears [8]). The contusion side is blunter still: Ryan's five ossification risk factors are the only named prevention list in this family — restore flexion early, treat immediately, respect the previous-injury and effusion flags [4]. Assembled for the lifter and the Sunday footballer: the quad enters the season trained, not assumed — direct, progressive, at-length strength work for a muscle that kicks and sprints; the first kicking and sprint sessions of any new season are ramped, not detonated; the warm-up is the program's first set, not ceremony; and after any quad injury the return runs on criteria — because the file that re-tears inside two months is the file that returned on the calendar [1][4][8][11][14].

So what do you actually do? The practical file

Six rules, every one sourced from the files above:

  1. Clear the fences before you program the thigh. The swelling-stiffening-hardening leg is the compartment door — emergency today; the pop above the kneecap with a knee that will not lock out straight is the tendon-rupture door — clinician today; the growing mass, the no-injury lump, the night pain is the mimic door — specialist now, and never a biopsy of an immature myositis [6]; the adolescent's pain at the pelvic bone is the apophysis file; fever or progressive weakness is the clinician-now door.
  2. Name the file before you load it. Strain (no contact, mid-contraction grab) versus contusion (a blow, the dead leg) versus DOMS (bilateral, next-day, novel-volume) run three different programs — and inside the strain, the address decides the calendar: central tendon a month-plus, peripheral RF under two weeks, vastus days [2][11].
  3. Do not rest it into a short, weak scar. The field inverted on both files: early tolerated motion aligns the regeneration, and the military contusion protocol — 120 degrees of passive flexion as soon as possible after the blow, held, then pain-free active work — is the loudest treatment effect this library carries at 3.5-day returns [5][12][13].
  4. Run the pain budget, not the pain-free fantasy. Loading may push discomfort during the set; the verdict is the morning after — reactivity that settles keeps the ladder climbing, reactivity that compounds steps it down. The reinjury file (16%, sidelining longer than the index; 40% of Brazil's re-injuries inside two months) is the price of ignoring the ledger [1][14].
  5. Load the quad at length, both jobs, before you need it again. Knee-extension strength and hip-flexion length are the two-joint muscle's two jobs — straight-leg raises and isometrics early, lengthening work through range as the budget allows, end-range knee flexion as the contusion's daily biomarker; a quad trained only mid-range buys nothing for the mechanism that tore it [2][8][11][12].
  6. Keep the rest of the program running and return on criteria. Upper body, core, the healthy leg, conditioning — from day one. And the return decision reads the record, not the calendar: symmetric strength, pain-free end-range flexion, sport-specific actions (the kick, the sprint start) passed in progression — with the proximal-avulsion file taken to the specialist conversation before any of it [4][8][12][13].

How RightRep fits into this

The front-of-thigh file is, at its core, a dose-and-address tracking question — and it is unanswerable without a record:

  • The dose memory. What fired it — the first sprint session of spring, the spike in kicking volume, the cold opener — is visible in a logged history before it is visible in the thigh [11][12].
  • The everything-else program. Rule six is a full-body program that skips nothing but the fence — counted, scored sessions keep the upper body, core, healthy leg and conditioning progressing through the rehabilitation weeks [12][13].
  • The ROM ledger. The contusion file's grading currency is knee-flexion range at the 24-hour mark and the trend after it — dated notes beside every session, morning reactivity beside every load, the flexion trend the return decision reads [4][5].
  • Range and tempo, rep by rep. Camera-scored reps keep the rebuilding ladder honest — the depth the program asked for, at the tempo it prescribed, no silent drift out of the range the budget allows.

The bottom line

  • The scale: 2,908 muscle injuries across 2,299 professional footballers; 92% in the four big lower-limb groups — hamstrings 37%, adductors 23%, quadriceps 19%, calf 13%; 16% reinjuries that sideline longer than the index tear [1].
  • The address: rectus-femoris central-tendon strains 26.9 days versus 9.2 peripheral versus 4.4 vastus versus 5.7 for the normal-MRI strains — "the red flag diagnosis" [2].
  • The mechanisms: running 29%, stretching/reaching 24%, kicking 22% of video-captured inciting events; non-contact OR 8.01; the avulsion file's kicking 47.6% and forced knee-flexion/hip-extension 42.9% [8][11].
  • The contusion file: graded by next-day knee flexion — mild >90°, moderate 45–90°, severe <45° at 13/19/21 days; myositis ossificans 9% with five named risk factors [4].
  • The flexion protocol: 120° held within 10 minutes of the blow, 24 hours — 47 midshipmen back to unrestricted sport in 3.5 days (range 2–5) [5].
  • The ossification door: benign and mostly self-limiting; conservative first, excision only after maturation; light activity 2–3 months, full 6, preinjury 12; never biopsy an immature lesion [6].
  • The inversion: immobilization fills the gap with disorganized scar while early mobilization aligns regeneration; the primer moved the field from rest and over-protection to early activation and progressive loading [12][13].
  • The avulsion door: 132 athletes, avulsions 86%; nonoperative RTP 93.3% at 11.7 weeks versus surgical 100% at 22.1 — complications 7.7% versus 18% [8][9].
  • The Brazil anchors: knee and thigh tied at 29% of all injuries in the elite women's file, muscle/tendon 47% of tissues, 18% re-injuries with 40% inside two months; Curitiba's youth pyramid counting muscle injuries at 59% [14][15].

Train everything the thigh doesn't need, load the quad early and progressively inside the budget, return on criteria — and let the camera keep the rest of the program honest at rightrep.app.

This post was written by the RightRep AI Assistant — the same AI that counts and scores your reps at rightrep.app.

Sources

  1. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Waldén M. Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer). American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011;39(6):1226–1232. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. Cross TM, Gibbs N, Houang MT, Cameron M. Acute quadriceps muscle strains: magnetic resonance imaging features and prognosis. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004;32(3):710–719. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Jackson DW, Feagin JA. Quadriceps contusions in young athletes. Relation of severity of injury to treatment and prognosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 1973;55(1):95–105. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Ryan JB, Wheeler JH, Hopkinson WJ, Arciero RA, Kolakowski KR. Quadriceps contusions. West Point update. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1991;19(3):299–304. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Aronen JG, Garrick JG, Chronister RD, McDevitt ER. Quadriceps contusions: clinical results of immediate immobilization in 120 degrees of knee flexion. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2006;16(5):383–387. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Devilbiss Z, Hess M, Ho GWK. Myositis ossificans in sport: a review. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 2018;17(9):290–295. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Torres RJL, Hattori S, Kato Y, Yamada S, Ohuchi H. Ultrasonography and return to play of the different clinical grading of quadriceps contusions: a case series. Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2018;45(2):375–380. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Knapik DM, Alter TD, Ganapathy A, Smith MV, Brophy RH, Matava MJ. Isolated, full-thickness proximal rectus femoris injury in competitive athletes: a systematic review of injury characteristics and return to play. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2023;11(1):23259671221144984. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Esser S, Jantz D, Hurdle MF, Taylor W. Proximal rectus femoris avulsion: ultrasonic diagnosis and nonoperative management. Journal of Athletic Training, 2015;50(7):778–780. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Sonnery-Cottet B, Barbosa NC, Tuteja S, Gardon R, Daggett M, Monnot D, Kajetanek C, Thaunat M. Surgical management of rectus femoris avulsion among professional soccer players. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2017;5(1):2325967116683940. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. Miralles-Iborra A, Rondón-Espinosa H, Vera-Garcia FJ, Courel-Ibáñez J, Manchón-Davó M, Del Coso J, Moreno-Pérez V. Inciting events of lower-limb muscle injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of video-based studies. Sports Medicine Open, 2026;12(1):120. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  12. Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kääriäinen M, Kalimo H, Järvinen M. Muscle injuries: biology and treatment. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005;33(5):745–764. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  13. Edouard P, Reurink G, Mackey AL, Lieber RL, Pizzari T, Järvinen TAH, Gronwald T, Hollander K. Traumatic muscle injury. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2023;9(1):56. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  14. Gasparin GB, Ribas LO, Flores HN, Bueno GBB, Vrkoslaw L, Bittencourt NFN, Baroni BM. Injuries in Brazilian elite women's football: a prospective cohort study of 133 players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2024;27(4):228–233. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  15. de Mattos Leão T, Dos Santos Borek R, de Oliveira Basso R, Zini C, Simm EB, Costa G, Picoli F, Szymczak Conde JH, Nisihara R. Characteristics of musculoskeletal injuries in youth football: a prospective study. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 2026;54(3):229–235. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov