RightRep EN · PT Open the app
BLOG

Can You Train With a Torn Pec? The Pectoralis-Rupture Audit: Where ElMaraghy's 188-Year Census Counted 365 Tears — 83% Indirect, 48% of Every Reported Case in the Gym, 75% Clustered in the Final 20 Years — Where Wolfe's Cadaver Bench Caught the Mechanism Red-Handed (the Short Inferior Sternal Fibers Lengthen Disproportionately Through the Final 30° of the Eccentric), Where Pochini's São Paulo 60-Case Prospective Put the Bench Press Behind 80% of Total Ruptures and Surgery Ahead of Everything (67.7% Excellent vs 0% Nonoperative, Isokinetic Deficit 14.3% vs 41.7%), Where Bak's 112-Case Meta-Analysis and Aärimaa's Ladder Agreed — Early Repair Beats Delayed Beats Conservative — While Gupton's 259-Repair Meta Found Timing No Longer Moves the Needle, Where Connell's MRI Split the File in Two (Partial 12 of 15, Muscle-Belly Tears Walk, Tendon Avulsions Get Referred), Where the NFL Returned 85.7% With No Measurable Performance Drop and the Army Sent 95.3% Back to Duty, Where Hauschild's Surveillance Caught the Tip Under the Iceberg (>95% of Pec Injuries Never Meet a Surgeon), Where Pochini's Ultrasound Found 80% of Lifters' Unruptured Tendons Remodeled vs 10% of Controls and His 2024 Microscope Found Two-Thirds of Ruptures Landing on Pre-Degenerated Tendon, Where Stefanou's Bodybuilders All Returned in 5.4 Months but One Was Lost to His Heart, and Where Mardani-Kivi Rebuilt Chronic Tears Up to 15 Years Old and Watched Two-Thirds Reclaim Their Bench Records: Tear the Muscle or Tear the Tendon — the First Trains Around, the Second Gets Repaired

By RightRep AI Assistant · · 21 min read

There is a fence at the top of this post and it outranks everything below it: a pop at the bottom of a heavy press followed by bruising sweeping across the chest and armpit, weakness bringing the arm across the body, and an armpit fold that looks visibly emptied next to the other side is the same-week orthopedic door — a complete tendon avulsion in an active lifter is a surgical injury evaluated inside a window that shrinks, and "wait a month and see whether it settles" is how an acute repair becomes a chronic reconstruction [1][4][13]. The second fence: numbness, pallor or a cold arm after the tear, or chest pain with breathlessness that is not clearly muscular = the emergency door, today, not after the weekend — the first is vascular compromise, the second is the heart wearing a chest-muscle costume. The third fence: a "pop" while benching that settles into pain where rib meets breastbone, with a symmetric chest and no armpit-fold asymmetry, is more likely costochondral than the pec tendon — but that split belongs to a clinician's exam and imaging, not to self-diagnosis [13]. The fourth fence, said plainly because this library's readers deserve it said plainly: a tear in a lifter using anabolic steroids opens the cardiac screening door — Stefanou's bodybuilder series returned every athlete to training and still lost one to a myocardial infarction within the year; the tendon is the presentation, not the whole risk [15]. The fifth: a "pec tear" from trivial load, off-axis, with a palpable mass or night pain, is the mimic door — clinician, imaging, not a training plan. And one honesty clause before anything else: even the field's own Brazilian prospective file found that 80% of patients arrived more than three months late [6] — the chronic door exists and it still works [16], but every month of delay trades simple anatomy for grafts and reconstruction [13]. With the fences respected, the question underneath is the lifter's oldest post-tear dilemma: the resting script ("you tore your chest, stop lifting, it heals like any muscle") versus the training-through script ("it's just a strain, tape it and press light"). The first script confuses the muscle belly with the tendon; the second confuses a partial tear with an avulsion. The audit splits the file by what tore — and the two halves have different answers.

The short answer: it depends what tore — the belly trains around it, the tendon gets repaired

Strip the file to its spine. The pec tear is the most weight-training-linked major injury in the entire literature: ElMaraghy and Devereaux's systematic review gathered every reported case from 1822 to 2010 — 365 tears in 188 years — and 48% of them happened during weight training, 83% indirect (the muscle failing under load, not a blow), with 75% clustered in the final 20 years of the window [1]. This is a gym injury in a way no other major tear is. The mechanism is the bench press's own geometry: Wolfe's team wired cadaver pec fibers to dial gauges through a simulated bench press and found the short inferior sternal fibers lengthening disproportionately through the final 30° of humeral extension — the bottom of the eccentric — where maximal load meets maximally stretched fibers [2]; Pochini's São Paulo prospective series attributed 80% of 60 total ruptures to the bench press itself [6]. The treatment file is one of the cleanest inversions in sports medicine: Bak's 112-case meta-analysis found surgical repair significantly better than conservative care, preferably inside eight weeks [4]; Aärimaa's Finnish file put the ladder in order — early repair beats delayed repair beats conservative [5]; and Pochini's 60 patients finished it: excellent outcome in 67.7% of the surgical group and 0% of the nonoperative group, isokinetic strength deficit 14.3% versus 41.7% [6]. And the return file is better than the noise around the injury suggests: 95.3% of surgically treated active-duty soldiers returned to duty [9], and 85.7% of NFL players who tore a pec returned to the league, with no significant change in Pro Football Focus performance grades from the season before to the season after [11]. The verdict writes itself: don't press through a tear you haven't graded — find out whether you tore the muscle belly or avulsed the tendon. The first is a programming problem you manage in the gym this week. The second is a surgical problem you manage with a shoulder surgeon this week. Everything else in the body still trains [9][11][16].

The census: 365 tears in 188 years, and three-quarters of them ours

The census door is ElMaraghy and Devereaux's, and it is the file's honesty spine. They pulled every reported pectoralis major injury from 1822 to 2010 — 365 cases across 188 years of medical literature — and the profile is specific: 83% indirect (the muscle tearing under its own load, not a contact blow), 48% during weight-training activities, and 75% of all cases occurring in the last 20 years of the window [1]. Read that trend line the way the bench-press audit reads it: shoulders did not get weaker between 1990 and 2010 — bench-heavy gym culture and maximum-load training grew. The tear is not a cost of doing business; it is the tail risk of a specific behavior: a maximal or unprepared eccentric at the bottom of a press [1][2][4]. The same review did the field its second service: a classification system, because the literature had been comparing unlike things for two centuries — tears graded by timing (acute versus chronic), location (origin, muscle belly, the musculotendinous junction through the tendon, or bony avulsion from the humerus), and extent (how much of the bilaminar tendon's anterior-to-posterior thickness, complete versus incomplete width) [1]. That third axis matters more than any other sentence in this file: the pec's tendon is a double-layered ribbon where the clavicular and sternal heads rotate into each other before inserting on the humerus — which is why "I tore my pec" spans everything from a belly bruise that trains through to a rolled-up tendon that needs surgery [1][2].

The modern denominator: the military counted what the gym doesn't

Three incidence files replace "rare" with numbers. Balazs' team queried the entire US military health system and found 291 active-duty personnel surgically repaired for pec tendon ruptures in just three years (2012–2014) — an incidence of 60 per 100,000 person-years, every single one of them male, mean age 30.5 [9]. Hauschild's Army surveillance team then asked the better question: what happens if you count the tears that never meet a surgeon? Applying a surveillance definition across all medical encounters, they estimated pec injury incidence more than 95% higher than the surgical-only count, with over 96% of the injury bill paid in outpatient services — strains, partial tears, overuse — while rates stayed flat from 2016 to 2018 [10]. The iceberg is real: what the gym calls a "torn pec" is mostly the small stuff on top; the surgical file below the waterline is the 60-per-100,000 tip. And the professional-sport mirror: Wise's NFL analysis counted 63 pec ruptures across 2010–2018 — against ten in the entire previous decade — linebackers hit most often, 79.3% of tears on defensive players, most during games [11]. Rising, male, 20-to-40, pressing population — every census agrees on the customer [9][10][11][13]. This library's reader is the census.

The mechanism: Wolfe's cadaver bench and the 200-kilogram video

Wolfe's 1992 study is still the mechanism file because nobody has needed to repeat it: nine of the fourteen ruptures in their twelve-patient clinical series happened while weight lifting, so they took human cadaver hemithoraxes, wired individual pec fibers to dial gauges, and ran a simulated bench press — measuring each fiber's excursion through the concentric and eccentric phases as a percentage of resting length. The finding: the short, inferior sternal fibers lengthen disproportionately during the final 30° of humeral extension — precisely the bottom of a deep bench press eccentric — so the fibers with the least slack meet the load at the moment of greatest stretch, and "application of high loads to these maximally stretched fibers produces rupture" [2]. Bak's meta-analysis supplies the arm position that maximizes the trap: ruptures occur when the arm is externally rotated and abducted — the wide-grip bench bottom, the deep dumbbell flye, the wrestling escape — and the file's complete tears sit overwhelmingly at the humeral insertion [4]. The moment itself got captured once: Ordas Bayon's patient was filming a 200-kilogram bench press when the tendon let go — snap, armpit pain, and an anterior axillary fold that vanished, repaired with suture anchors, excellent at one year [17]. Watch the eccentric you actually control: the file's mechanism is not "the bench press" — it is the bottom position of a heavy eccentric met unprepared [2][4], which is why the programming door below is about tempo and dose, not about retiring the lift.

What tore decides everything: the imaging door

The exam comes first and it is free: compare the two sides — swelling, bruising across the chest and inner arm, a lost or asymmetric anterior axillary fold (the armpit's front border the pec builds), weakness bringing the arm across the body against resistance, and on formal exam a decreased pectoralis major index [13]. What the exam cannot do is separate the three files the treatment depends on, and that is MRI's job. Connell's radiology series took 15 men — nine of them injured lifting weights, bench-pressing above all — and MRI split them cleanly: partial tears outnumbered complete tears 12 to 3; six tears sat at the musculotendinous junction, five of them treated without surgery; eight of the nine tendon avulsions from the humerus went to primary surgical repair; and MRI's read was confirmed in every surgically explored case [3]. The sternal head, the one Wolfe's cadavers put at mechanical disadvantage, is the common tenant: both heads torn in ten of Connell's fifteen, the sternal head alone in three [2][3]. And the clock shows on the scan: acute tears read as hemorrhage and edema; chronic ones as fibrosis, scarring and retraction — the tendon shortening and curling away from its insertion, which is exactly what turns a straightforward reattachment into a graft reconstruction [3][13]. This is the door where "should I get it looked at" stops being a temperament question: an active lifter with a pop, bruising and a changed armpit fold gets an MRI and a shoulder-surgeon read — because partial-belly tears walk, and avulsions get referred, and no program can tell them apart from the outside [3][6][13].

The treatment ladder: the field's cleanest inversion, with its honest asterisk

The treatment file has been remarkably stable for twenty-five years. Bak's meta-analysis of 112 cases (every reported patient to 2000 with usable data) found surgical treatment significantly better than conservative — preferably within the first eight weeks — with the complete tears concentrated at the humeral insertion, and prognosis unrelated to age or tear location [4]. Aärimaa's Finnish series added 33 operatively treated total ruptures and a meta-analysis of everything published in English: early operation beat delayed operation, and delayed operation beat conservative care, for total and near-total tears [5]. Pochini's prospective file is the modern spine: 60 athletes with total ruptures followed prospectively from 1997 to 2012 (mean follow-up 48 months), surgical reinsertion in 51%, nonoperative in 49%, all graded on Bak's criteria — excellent in 67.7% of the surgical group and none of the nonoperative group; fair in twelve nonoperative patients and no surgical patients; poor in 31% nonoperative versus 9.7% surgical; and the isokinetic deficit at 60°/s: 41.7% without surgery, 14.3% with it [6]. Now the asterisk, because this family quotes its limits: Gupton's surgical meta-analysis pooled 259 repairs with reported timing and found no statistically significant outcome difference between acute and delayed repair — 72.6% were acute — and across 265 technique-comparable cases, transosseous suture and suture anchor beat the unicortical button on paper (OR 6.28 and 3.40), while the reviewers' own conclusion was that all three are accepted options and the best technique is the one your surgeon does most [12]. The apparent contradiction resolves honestly: the meta-analyses agree surgery beats waiting for complete tears in active people [4][5][6]; what the newer file questions is whether the eight-week cliff is as hard as Bak drew it — while the delay does measurably raise complication risk in the military file (surgery more than six weeks after injury was a significant risk factor for postoperative complications) and chronic tears need grafts more often [9][13]. Abro's 2025 review of the last decade lands the summary: surgical repair delivers high return-to-sport and satisfaction with rare complications — and rehabilitation protocols remain unstandardized, so your surgeon's protocol is the one that counts [14].

The chronic door: late is harder, not lost

Here is the door most internet threads close incorrectly. Pochini's own series — the surgical spine of the field — opened with 41 of 60 patients (80%) arriving more than three months after the tear, and they were still repaired and still recovered [6]. The reconstructive file goes further: Mardani-Kivi's team took 22 bodybuilders with 24 ruptures — 21 of them chronic, injured up to 182 months (fifteen years) before surgery — augmented the shortened tendons with Achilles allograft, and returned professional-level training at a mean 10.9 months, with 16 of 24 (66.7%) back to their pre-injury bench press records; Bak criteria graded four excellent, eighteen good, two fair, with no infections [16]. The chronic tendon retracts and fibroses [3], the repair becomes a reconstruction with autograft or allograft tissue [13], and the calendar roughly doubles (5.4 months acute [15] against 10.9 chronic [16]) — but "I waited too long" is a reconstructable situation, not a lost one. What the chronic door does not forgive is the other direction: deciding it is chronic without a surgeon having said so. That is the fence from the top of this file wearing a calendar.

The return door: 95.3% of soldiers, 85.7% of the NFL, and no performance drop

The return file is the quietest good news in this archive. The military: of 214 surgically repaired active-duty patients with at least a year of follow-up, 95.3% returned to military duty — a population whose job description includes push-ups [9]. The NFL: 85.7% of players who tore a pec between 2010 and 2018 returned to play, and among those who returned, Pro-Focus performance grades showed no significant change from the season before to the season after the tear [11]. That is the sentence to hold onto at week three, when the arm is in a sling and the chest bruise is every color: the reference outcome for a repaired pec in a high-load athlete is back to baseline, not a managed decline [11][14]. Bodybuilders returned to unrestricted training at 5.4 months (range 5–7) in Stefanou's series [15], the chronic reconstructed at 10.9 [16], and Abro's decade review reads the whole file as high return-to-sport with rare complications [14]. Kowalczuk's review keeps the honesty on the table: rerupture, persistent pain and wound infection remain the named risks of the surgical door [13]. The program below is built around those numbers — criteria, not calendar — but the headline is that the ceiling is your old training, not a diminished version of it.

The lifter's tendon: adaptation is remodeling, and rupture lands on a remodeled tendon

Two studies from the same São Paulo group reframe what long-term pressing does to the pec tendon — and both halves matter. First, the ultrasound file: Pochini's Einstein (São Paulo) study scanned the unruptured, contralateral pec tendon of ten long-term weight-training athletes against ten controls — 80% of the lifters' tendons carried ultrasonographic tendinopathy against 10% of controls (P=0.0055), while elastography found no stiffness difference between the groups (P=0.1409) [7]. Read that pair carefully, because it is neither of the internet's two stories: decades of loading do remodel the tendon's structure (the 80%), but remodeling is not brittleness — the stiffness measurement came back equal, and adaptation is not a ticking bomb [7]. Second, the microscope file: in the 2024 study, 26 men with acute total ruptures had their torn tendon fragments read histologically — degenerative changes in 66.7% of fragments (50% mild, 16.7% high-grade) — with the MRI of the other side showing tendinopathy in over 92% of them; the authors' conclusion: total acute rupture among weightlifters may land on tendon that was already degenerating before the tear [8]. Put together with Hauschild's surveillance file — where the Army's prevention conclusion aims squarely at bench-press dose control [10] — the tendon door says: your pressing history built the tendon you press with; the modifiable variable is the dose and the eccentric you expose it to, not the years on the bar. That is the progressive-overload contract with a histology receipt.

The steroid door: the honest file

This section quotes its sources precisely, because both halves are usually told wrong. Stefanou's series: six bodybuilders tore their pecs while lifting; all were repaired with suture anchors; all returned to full activity within a mean 5.4 (5–7) months; there were no postoperative complications — despite continued anabolic steroid use through recovery; and one patient died of a myocardial infarction within a year of surgery [15]. The authors' own reading of the mechanism is unusually candid: anabolic steroids may contribute to the tear through an excessive upward adjustment of the athlete's lifting goals — loads racing past what the tendon was prepared for — rather than through a simple chemical brittleness, and continuing use did not measurably impair tendon healing [15]. The elite-sport mirror: only 6.9% of the NFL's torn-pec players had been suspended for performance-enhancing drugs during their careers — the injury is not exclusive to enhanced lifting [11], and the histology above says unenhanced tendons degenerate too [8]. What the file does say, without cushioning: the enhanced lifter who tears a pec carries a cardiac risk file the tendon visit is a chance to open — the one death in six was the heart, not the repair [15]. If that is you, take the referral.

Training through it: the programming door

With the fences standing and the tear graded, the program writes itself — three lists. What trains from day one, every path: the legs (the squat pattern needs no pec, and gait often needs a sling not a ban), the core, the back that is not holding the injured arm, and — the door lifters forget — the healthy side: train it hard, not light; there is no law of sympathy that says the uninjured arm must detrain while the other heals. Cardio that needs no arm swing: bike, zone-2 work, walking with the arm protected per your protocol. What modifies by stage: for the partial belly tear that MRI graded minor, pressing usually returns within weeks to months as pain allows — the dose drops, the bottom-position eccentric gets controlled, tempo becomes deliberate, and every session is judged by the next morning, not by the plan [3][13][14]. For the surgical path, the surgeon's protocol owns the first months — protection, then passive and active-assisted range, then progressive loading — because protocols are genuinely unstandardized and yours is the one that was chosen for your repair [14]. What stops until cleared: barbell bench, incline and decline pressing, dips, flyes, push-ups, heavy carries and anything that puts the arm into the abducted-externally-rotated bottom position under load — the exact mechanism door from Wolfe's cadavers [2][4]. Two habits prevent the next one better than any supplement: a real warm-up ramp into work weight, and autoregulated heavy sets that stop short of the grind — the tear's habitat is the unprepared maximal eccentric [1][2][10]. And through all of it: track the work, because the comeback is a program you will want evidence on [11].

The bottom line

  • The census: 365 tears in 188 years, 48% in the gym, 83% indirect, 75% in the last 20 years of the window — the most weight-training-linked major injury in the literature [1].
  • The denominator: 60 per 100,000 person-years surgically in the military [9]; over 95% more pec injuries than surgical counts capture, over 96% of the cost outpatient [10]; NFL ruptures 63 in 2010–2018 against 10 the decade before [11].
  • The mechanism: the short inferior sternal fibers lengthen disproportionately through the final 30° of the bench eccentric — maximal load meeting maximal stretch [2]; the arm externally rotated and abducted [4]; a 200-kg rupture captured on video [17].
  • The split: partial 12 of 15 against complete 3 of 15; junction tears mostly walk, avulsions mostly get surgery — MRI decides, not vibe [3].
  • The ladder: surgery beats conservative for complete tears in active people — Bak's <8-week window [4], Aärimaa's early > delayed > conservative [5], Pochini's 67.7% vs 0% excellent and 14.3% vs 41.7% strength deficit [6]; the asterisk: across 259 timed repairs, timing no longer moved outcomes, and technique washes out to surgeon proficiency [12].
  • The chronic door: 80% of Pochini's own series arrived chronic and still repaired [6]; reconstructed tears up to 15 years old returned 66.7% to their previous bench numbers at ~11 months [16].
  • The return: 95.3% of soldiers back to duty [9]; 85.7% of NFL players back, no measurable performance drop [11]; bodybuilders at 5.4 months [15].
  • The tendon: 80% of lifters' unruptured tendons remodeled vs 10% of controls, stiffness equal [7]; two-thirds of ruptures land on pre-degenerated tendon [8]; prevention aims at bench dose [10].
  • The steroid door: healing unimpaired in six, one heart lost — the cardiac screening referral is part of the treatment [15].

Tear the muscle or tear the tendon — the first trains around, the second gets repaired, and both come back to the bar: grade the tear this week, respect the fences, let the camera keep your comeback honest at rightrep.app.

This post was written by the RightRep AI Assistant — the same AI that counts and scores your reps at rightrep.app.

Sources

  1. ElMaraghy AW, Devereaux MW. A systematic review and comprehensive classification of pectoralis major tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2012;21(3):412–422. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. Wolfe SW, Wickiewicz TL, Cavanaugh JT. Ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle. An anatomic and clinical analysis. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1992;20(5):587–593. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Connell DA, Potter HG, Sherman MF, Wickiewicz TL. Injuries of the pectoralis major muscle: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology, 1999;210(3):785–791. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Bak K, Cameron EA, Henderson IJP. Rupture of the pectoralis major: a meta-analysis of 112 cases. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2000;8(2):113–119. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Aärimaa V, Rantanen J, Heikkilä J, Helttula I, Orava S. Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004;32(5):1256–1262. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. de Castro Pochini A, Andreoli CV, Belangero PS, Figueiredo EA, Terra BB, Cohen C, Andrade Mdos S, Cohen M, Ejnisman B. Clinical considerations for the surgical treatment of pectoralis major muscle ruptures based on 60 cases: a prospective study and literature review. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014;42(1):95–102. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. de Castro Pochini A, Ferretti M, Kawakami EF, Fernandes Ada R, Yamada AF, Oliveira GC, Cohen M, Andreoli CV, Ejnisman B. Analisys of pectoralis major tendon in weightlifting athletes using ultrasonography and elastography. Einstein (São Paulo), 2015;13(4):541–546. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. de Castro Pochini A, Ejnisman B, Andreoli CV, Lara PHS, Godoy IRB, Ribeiro LM, Seixas MT, Belangero PS, Hipolide DC. Anabolic steroids and the evaluation of patients with acute PM tendon rupture using microscopy and MRI. Journal of Surgical Case Reports, 2024;2024(3):rjae126. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Balazs GC, Brelin AM, Donohue MA, Dworak TC, Rue JP, Giuliani JR, Dickens JF. Incidence rate and results of the surgical treatment of pectoralis major tendon ruptures in active-duty military personnel. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2016;44(7):1837–1843. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Hauschild VD, Grier TL, Schuh-Renner A, Forrest LJ, Hirleman CE, Pinyan E, Jones BH. Pectoralis major injuries in the military: a surveillance approach to reduce an underestimated problem. BMJ Military Health, 2022;168(4):286–291. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. Wise PM, Ptasinski AM, Gallo RA. Pectoralis major ruptures in the National Football League: incidence, RTP, and performance analysis. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2021;9(6):23259671211018707. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  12. Gupton M, Johnson JE. Surgical treatment of pectoralis major muscle ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019;7(2):2325967118824551. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  13. Kowalczuk M, Elmaraghy A. Pectoralis major rupture: evaluation and management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2022;30(7):e617–e627. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  14. Abro AA, Aziz N, Memon K, Fatima T. Return to functional activity after pectoralis major surgical treatment: a comprehensive review. Cureus, 2025;17(2):e79283. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  15. Stefanou N, Karamanis N, Bompou E, Vasdeki D, Mellos T, Dailiana ZH. Pectoralis major rupture in body builders: a case series including anabolic steroid use. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2023;24(1):264. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  16. Mardani-Kivi M, Maddahi A, Leili EK, Asadi K, Darabipour Z, Haghparast Ghadim-Limudahi Z. Pectoralis major rupture repair with Achilles tendon allograft in 22 bodybuilding athletes. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 2023;28(5):1118–1123. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  17. Ordas Bayon A, Sandoval E, Valencia Mora M. Acute pectoralis major rupture captured on video. Case Reports in Orthopedics, 2016;2016:2482189. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov