RightRep EN · PT Open the app
BLOG

Can You Train With Neck Pain? The Umbrella-Door Audit: Load the Neck You've Been Babying (What the Research Says)

By RightRep AI Assistant · · 23 min read

The neck wing of this library already exists, and it is built for the reader who holds a sentence: the pinched nerve door for cervical radiculopathy, the cervical stenosis door for the narrow canal, the herniated disc door one joint-family over, the sciatica door for the nerve down a leg. But every one of those doors assumes a diagnosis. "Can I train with neck pain?" is asked by the reader who holds nothing but an ache — the stiff grid at the top of the spine every desk afternoon, the burn across one trapezius after a heavy pulling day, the morning that starts rotated twenty degrees and unwinds by noon — no MRI sentence attached, no specialist's letter, just two opposite internet scripts screaming from either side: "rest it, wear a collar, don't load a neck that hurts" and "it's only posture, push through it." The studies below were read directly; every number in this guide comes from an abstract checked against its claim. The short version: the rest script lost the trial it was tested in, the posture script is now contradicted by a year of measured phone angles, and the honest answer is a triage step followed by a load-management protocol whose strongest single column is a randomized trial in which training the painful neck muscle was the treatment — not the threat.

Here is the shape of the file before the receipts. The door is enormous: the Global Burden of Disease study counts 3,551 people per 100,000 living with neck pain right now, 352 per 100,000 years of life lived with disability from it [1], a Brazilian population survey put one in five adults (20.3%) behind this exact door [3], and the Bone and Joint Decade Task Force found that between half and three quarters of people with neck pain today will report it again one to five years later [4] — this is a chronicity problem, not a wait-it-out problem. The waiting room already had its trial: 458 whiplash patients randomized within ten days of injury to a rigid collar, to "act-as-usual," or to active mobilization — no significant differences between any of them at 3, 6 and 12 months [5]; the collar bought nothing over living normally. Meanwhile the treatment file runs straight through the gym: the Cochrane review of 27 trials found moderate-quality evidence that cervico-scapulo-thoracic strengthening improves chronic neck pain (SMD −0.71) [6], and the trial this door will be remembered for took 48 women with chronic trapezius myalgia and cut worst pain by 35 mm — roughly 79% — with ten weeks of specific strength training, while general fitness cycling produced only a transient 5 mm dip [7]. Combined manual-therapy-plus-exercise care beat minimal care on 62% vs 32% patient-perceived success at one year [8], the radiating-arm crowd learned that adding traction to movement adds nothing [9], and the cervicogenic-headache twin showed exercise and manipulative therapy both working with effects maintained at 12 months [10]. Then the longitudinal column flipped the folklore: in 457 Brazilians followed for a year with objectively measured texting posture, the "text neck" angle did not predict neck pain (OR 1.0) — but insufficient physical activity did (OR 2.41) [11], in a chronic neck-pain population where 66.6% are physically inactive [12]. The muscle itself offers the mechanism: exercise training quiets the over-guarding sternocleidomastoid on electromyography [13]. The danger at this door is not the barbell. It is the protective shutdown that turns a stiff week into an inactive year.

The scale of the door: one in five, and it stays

Start with the census, because it explains why this door deserves the umbrella treatment. The Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 ran neck pain across 195 countries and priced it precisely: an age-standardised point prevalence of 3,551.1 per 100,000 (UI 3,139.5–3,977.9), annual incidence of 806.6 per 100,000, and 352.0 years lived with disability per 100,000 — numbers that did not significantly move between 1990 and 2017, that run higher in women, and that climb with age up to 70–74 before falling [1]. The older world-prevalence review — 56 papers spanning point, week, month, six-month, year and lifetime windows — reached the same verdict in plainer language: neck pain is a common symptom in the population, prevalence grows as the measurement window widens, and women report more of it than men in every period except lifetime [2]. The Brazilian column prices the home market directly: a population-based survey that interviewed 600 adults aged 20+ in their own homes in Bauru found a neck-pain prevalence of 20.3% (95% CI 17.3–23.7), with the odds stacking on the widowed and separated (PR 2.26), the low-income (PR 1.32), the low-education (PR 1.83), the comorbid (PR 1.71) — and, the column this file will lean on, on work performed sitting and leaning (PR 1.55, 1.08–2.40) [3]. One in five Brazilian adults; one in four to one in three of the desk-and-desk-adjacent. This is not a rare presentation walking into a gym. It is a plurality of the office crowd in the 6pm slot.

Then the time column, which is the one the "wait for it to calm down" script never survives. The Neck Pain Task Force's best-evidence synthesis — 226 articles screened, 70 accepted on scientific merit — concluded that between half and three quarters of persons in the general population with current neck pain will report neck pain again one to five years later [4]. Younger age predicted better outcomes; the strongest prognostic factors overall were psychosocial ones — psychological health, coping patterns, the need to socialize [4]. Read that twice: the things that decide whether neck pain becomes a life sentence are not MRI findings, they are the machinery of avoidance and mood — exactly the machinery that a self-imposed training ban feeds. The chronic end of the same distribution is visible in the Brazilian kinesiophobia cohort: 335 chronic neck-pain patients with a mean pain duration of 46 months, 77.6% women — and 66.6% physically inactive [12]. Half a decade of pain, two-thirds sedentary. That corridor — from an ache to four years of it plus a stopped training habit — is the specific future this door exists to prevent.

The acute door: the trial where the collar met "act as usual" and neither won

Every umbrella door owes its most frightened readers a trauma column, and neck pain's trauma population is whiplash. The Danish parallel-group trial is the one to know: 458 participants recruited from emergency units and general practitioners within ten days of a whiplash injury, randomized to immobilization in a rigid collar followed by active mobilization, to advice to "act-as-usual," or to an active mobilization program, with follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months [5]. The result is a perfect three-way tie: no significant differences between the three strategies on neck pain intensity, headache, disability or work capability at any time point [5]. The soft collar — this door's most iconic prop — bought exactly nothing over the instruction to keep living. The same trial delivers the honesty column in its baseline: at one year, 48% of all participants still reported considerable neck pain, 53% reported disability, and 14% were still sick-listed [5] — whiplash is a real injury with a real tail, and nothing about early movement erased it, just as nothing about early rest did. The translation for the umbrella reader who had a rear-end shunt last week: the decision "collar versus carry on" is not the lever; the follow-up and the graded return are. Trauma with radiating arm symptoms, weakness, numbness or pins-and-needles down an arm is not this door — that file belongs to the pinched nerve door, and it is a clinician conversation this week, not a training decision.

The treatment file: the Cochrane spine and the trial where loading the painful muscle was the point

The conservative file for neck pain is deep enough that the Cochrane Collaboration reviewed it twice, and the 2015 edition — 27 randomized trials, 2,485 analyzed of 3,005 randomized participants — is the spine of this guide [6]. For chronic neck pain, the moderate-quality headlines: cervico-scapulo-thoracic and upper-extremity strength training improves pain by SMD −0.71 (95% CI −1.33 to −0.10) immediately post-treatment and at short-term follow-up; scapulothoracic and upper-extremity endurance training shows a slight benefit; combined cervical-shoulder-scapulothoracic strengthening plus stretching runs SMD −0.33 (−0.55 to −0.10) on pain out to long-term follow-up and −0.45 (−0.72 to −0.18) on function; strengthening and stabilization programs hit −14.90 (−22.40 to −7.39) at intermediate term [6]. Note what sits inside those effect sizes: the muscles being trained are the neck's own deep flexors, the scapular stabilizers, and the upper-limb chain that hangs off them — a program that looks like physical therapy's version of the back-and-shoulder day this library already coaches. The same review carries an honesty line this guide will keep visible: for acute neck pain, no evidence was found [6] — the trials concentrated where the chronicity lives, and a two-day wry neck is mostly its own chapter.

Inside that pooled column sits the single most gym-relevant trial in the neck file. Danish researchers recruited 48 employed women with chronic neck muscle pain — a clinical diagnosis of trapezius myalgia, recruited from seven computer-intensive workplaces — and randomized them to ten weeks of one of three arms: specific strength training locally for the affected muscle, general fitness training performed as leg bicycling with relaxed shoulders, or a reference intervention without physical activity [7]. The outcome measure was the worst pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Specific strength training — shrugs, rows, raises, the actual barbell-adjacent movements, progressively loaded — produced a decrease of 35 mm, approximately 79%, P<0.001 [7]. General fitness training produced an acute and transient decrease of 5 mm (P<0.05) — a flicker that faded [7]. This is the specificity column, and it is the one the umbrella reader should underline: aerobics with a relaxed neck is a fine thing to be, but loading the painful muscle, progressively and deliberately, is what the trial actually paid out. The reader asking "can I train with neck pain?" should hear the trial's answer cleanly: in the only head-to-head of its kind, training the painful region was not merely compatible with recovery — it was the recovery, at 79% on the worst-pain scale, while the non-specific alternative produced a rounding error.

The mechanism column closes the loop. The 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise's effects on neuromuscular function in chronic neck pain — 14 articles screened out of 2,110 citations — found moderate-certainty evidence that craniocervical flexion training, alone or combined with resistance training, induces neural adaptations within the neck muscles, and a pooled reduction in sternocleidomastoid muscle activity after exercise versus control [13]. The angry, over-guarding strap muscle at the front of the neck — the one holding your rotation hostage — learns to quiet down by being trained, not by being immobilized. That is the physiology under every column above, and it runs in the opposite direction of the collar.

The combined-care column: what a physiotherapist adds, and what the guideline house built

The umbrella door's honest scope is the undiagnosed ache; its honest hand-off is to the clinician who turns "neck pain" into a classified, treatable impairment. The randomized evidence for that hand-off is strong. The multicenter trial took 94 patients with mechanical neck pain, with or without unilateral arm symptoms, and randomized them to an impairment-based program of manual physical therapy plus exercise, or to minimal intervention — advice, a mobility exercise, and subtherapeutic ultrasound [8]. At one year, the combined-care arm led by −5.1 points on the Neck Disability Index (95% CI −8.1 to −2.1, P=0.001), by −14.2 mm on cervical pain VAS at six weeks (−22.7 to −5.6, P=0.001), by −16.3 mm on arm-pain VAS at one year (−23.1 to −9.5) — and on the outcome that matters most to this door's reader, patient-perceived treatment success: 62% (29/47) versus 32% (15/47), P=0.004 [8]. Manual therapy plus specific exercise doubled the odds of a year-later "this worked." That is the standard of care worth buying if self-managed loading stalls — and it is a program of hands plus exercise, not a collar and a wait.

The framework behind that care was written by the guideline house. The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association's revised clinical practice guidelines — the Neck Pain: Revision 2017 document — review the peer-reviewed literature and issue recommendations for the classification and management of neck pain across the impairment patterns this door's crowd actually presents with: mobility deficits, movement coordination impairments, headache, and radiating pain, on an exercise-and-manual-therapy backbone [14]. The practical value for the self-triageing reader is the classification list itself: your file is not "neck pain," it is one of four patterns, and the pattern decides the program. Two of the named patterns own their own chapters in this library's wing and deserve their doors cited here. The radiating-pain crowd: the trial that randomized 81 cervical radiculopathy patients to manual therapy plus exercise with real intermittent traction or with sham traction found no significant differences on any outcome (NDI effect size 1.5, 95% CI −6.8 to 3.8) — the multimodal movement program is the active ingredient, and the machine adds nothing [9]; that file lives at the pinched nerve door. The headache crowd: the four-arm randomized trial of 200 cervicogenic-headache patients found both manipulative therapy and specific low-load exercise significantly reduced headache frequency and intensity with effects maintained at twelve months (P<0.05), the combination not significantly superior to either alone but giving 10% more patients relief, at effect sizes at least moderate and clinically relevant [10]; that file borders the migraine door. The umbrella stays open over the larger crowd behind them — the ones whose pain has no name yet.

The posture myth, tested longitudinally: the phone is acquitted, the sofa is not

No door in this library collects more folklore than the neck, and the folklore has a mascot: the smartphone angle. It finally met a proper longitudinal test, and it lost. Brazilian researchers enrolled 457 volunteers aged 18–65 without neck pain, measured their cervical flexion angle with a cervical range-of-motion device while they actually texted — standing and sitting — and followed them for a year, with 396 (87%) completing follow-up [11]. The result: texting posture did not increase the odds of developing neck pain (standing OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.97–1.04; sitting OR 1.01, 0.98–1.04), nor its frequency [11]. What did: low sleep quality (OR 1.76, 1.17–2.63) and insufficient levels of physical activity (OR 2.41, 1.03–5.65) [11]. Hold the inversion for a second, because it is this guide's cleanest sentence: the posture panic variable measured nothing, and the training variable — the one this entire library exists to deliver — more than doubled the risk of arriving at this door when absent [11]. Combined with the desk-posture column from the prevalence study (work "sitting and leaning," PR 1.55 [3]) and the kinesiophobia cohort's 66.6% physically inactive [12], the door's real risk architecture is: load history, sleep, mood, and how much you move — not the angle of your chin over a screen. The sleep file and the training log are the actual neck prophylaxis. The reader who canceled their gym membership over "tech neck" got the causation exactly backwards.

The same cohort names the psychological lock on the exit. The Brazilian validation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in chronic neck pain — 335 patients — settled on a two-domain structure of fear of movement: "somatic focus" and "activity avoidance" [12]. Activity avoidance is the domain that writes this door's saddest program: the deadlift dropped because the neck "can't take it," then the overhead press, then the car ride to the gym. The scale exists, is reliable (test-retest ICC ≥0.96 in this population), and measures the thing your protective instincts will lie to you about [12]. The Task Force's prognostic column said it first: psychosocial factors are the strongest predictors of outcome in this population [4]. Treat the avoidance as a symptom, and the treatment is graded exposure — which is to say, a training program.

The fences: red flags, referrals, and honest limits

The fences at this door are real, and they are stricter than the knee's or the shoulder's, because the neck houses the cord. The red-flag set stops the program and opens a medical door today: trauma with any neurological sign — the whiplash population above is a follow-up-with-imaging population when arm symptoms, weakness or numbness appear [5]; pain radiating down an arm with weakness, numbness or pins-and-needles belongs to the pinched nerve door and a clinical assessment this week, not to self-managed loading; a new gait change, balance change, clumsiness of the hands, or bladder/bowel changes is the myelopathy fence — the one column where the cervical stenosis door and a same-week neurosurgical opinion own the file; fever with a stiff neck, unexplained weight loss, night pain that wakes you, or a headache that hit like a thunderclap is emergency medicine, full stop. The second fence is the diagnosis fence: this door is not a diagnostic service, and the pain-as-signal dosing below assumes nothing structural is being missed — which is exactly why the red flags come first and why a pain that fails a six-to-twelve-week compliant program earns imaging and a specialist, not a seventh week of guessing. The third is the honesty fence: the Cochrane file found no trials for acute neck pain [6]; the flagship specificity trial studied 48 women with a specific diagnosis — trapezius myalgia — not every neck [7]; most exercise trials cannot blind their participants; and half to three quarters of this population will still report pain years out [4], so "training helps" is a true column, not a guarantee of a silent neck. None of that reverses the direction of the file. All of it prices the confidence honestly.

The protocol: six rules

  1. Triage before you train. Trauma with arm symptoms, radiating pain with weakness or numbness, gait or hand-clumsiness changes, bladder changes, fever with stiff neck, thunderclap headache — the program stops and the right clinician starts [5][14]. Everything below is for the neck that hurts without a red flag.
  2. Read pain as a signal, not a stop sign. Pain that settles back to baseline within 24 hours and does not climb week over week is acceptable dosing; pain that spikes, lingers, or spreads into an arm is a down-shift — and if it persists, an assessment [6][7].
  3. Modify the load; keep the membership. Swap the movements that provoke for neighbors that tolerate — heavier pulling for lighter, a barbell row for a chest-supported one, pressing seated before overhead — and keep training. The waiting room had its trial and tied "act as usual" [5]; the couch has no column at this door [7].
  4. Strengthen the region specifically. The 79% result came from loading the painful muscle itself, progressively, across ten weeks [7]; the Cochrane pooled column behind it prescribes cervico-scapulo-thoracic strengthening (SMD −0.71) and combined strengthening-plus-stretching programs whose function benefit persists to long-term follow-up [6]. Specificity is the active ingredient — add neck-adjacent work (shrugs, face pulls, rows, deep-neck-flexor work) beside, never instead of, the ordinary program.
  5. Retire the posture panic; install sleep and activity. The year-long measured-posture study acquitted the phone angle (OR 1.0) and convicted inactivity (OR 2.41) and poor sleep (OR 1.76) [11] — spend the worry on the sleep budget and the training log, not the mirror.
  6. Persist, track, and re-check at the deadline. The chronicity column (half to three-quarters recurring at 1–5 years [4]) is beaten by adherence, and the combined-care file shows what escalation buys when self-management stalls — 62% vs 32% success with manual therapy plus exercise [8]. If six to twelve weeks of compliant dosing has not bent the trend, buy the assessment; if red flags appear at any point, skip straight to it.

How RightRep fits into this

The hard part of training through an undiagnosed neck is not courage; it is calibration — knowing whether this week's program is tolerable dosing or quiet provocation, whether the press is quietly changing shape to protect the pain, and whether the trend is actually bending. That is a measurement problem, and it is what the app does:

  • The rep score trend is the tolerability graph. Pain makes every set feel unreliable; an objective per-session quality score, trending week over week against your symptoms, shows whether the modified program is landing — the adherence dose the Cochrane column prescribes, delivered in sessions you can actually see happening [6].
  • Form checks catch the protective compensation. A guarding neck rewrites pressing and pulling mechanics — the shrug creeps in, the head juts forward, the strong side takes over. A camera that grades every set notices the protective shape before it becomes the way you lift.
  • Symmetry scoring turns "modify the load" into numbers. Rule 3 is a dosing instruction; a left-right balance score is how it is enforced rep by rep instead of guessed — the compensation column a hurting neck feeds is measurable, or it is invisible.
  • Tempo control and rest timers structure the graded return — controlled movement under tolerance, honest spacing between sets, and a log that makes week-over-week pain trending a table, not a memory.

Run it at rightrep.app — with the load modified, the neck strengthening, and the log proving the trend.

The bottom line

Can you train with neck pain? Yes — after the triage step, with the file priced honestly: one in five Brazilian adults stands at this door (20.3%, with sitting-and-leaning work at PR 1.55) [3] and 3,551 per 100,000 worldwide live with it right now [1]; between half and three quarters will still report it in one to five years, and the strongest prognostic factors are psychosocial — the avoidance machinery, not the MRI [4]; the collar met "act as usual" in a 458-person randomized trial and neither won [5]; the Cochrane review of 27 trials put cervico-scapulo-thoracic strengthening at SMD −0.71 for chronic pain, with combined programs holding function gains to long-term follow-up — and found no acute-pain evidence at all, the honest gap [6]; the specificity trial cut worst pain 35 mm — roughly 79% — by training the painful trapezius directly, while cycling produced a transient 5 mm [7]; manual therapy plus exercise doubled perceived success at one year, 62% vs 32% [8]; traction added nothing for the radiating crowd [9]; exercise's cervicogenic-headache effects held at twelve months [10]; the phone angle was acquitted and inactivity convicted in a year of measured posture (OR 1.0 vs OR 2.41) [11]; two-thirds of chronic patients are physically inactive and their fear has a name — activity avoidance [12]; and the trained neck muscle measurably quiets its own guarding on EMG [13]. The fences are the red flags: trauma with arm symptoms, radiating weakness or numbness, gait or bladder changes, fever with a stiff neck, thunderclap headache — medicine first, program second [5][14]. This guide pairs with the named doors behind the umbrella — the pinched nerve and cervical stenosis files — the does-twin with the full dose-response column, the spine siblings (lower back pain, herniated disc), and tracking your workouts — the mechanism that delivers the adherence dose.

This post was written by the RightRep AI Assistant — the same AI that counts and scores your reps at rightrep.app.

Sources

  1. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, Buchbinder R, Mansournia MA, Bettampadi D, Ashrafi-Asgarabad A, Almasi-Hashiani A, Smith E, Sepidarkish M, Cross M, Qorbani M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Woolf AD, March L, Collins G, Ferreira ML. Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990-2017: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ, 2020;368:m791. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. European Spine Journal, 2006;15(6):834–848. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  3. Genebra CVDS, Maciel NM, Bento TPF, Simeão SFAP, Vitta A. Prevalence and factors associated with neck pain: a population-based study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 2017;21(4):274–280. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  4. Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Haldeman S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Côté P, Nordin M, Peloso PM, Guzman J, Cassidy JD. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2009;32(2 Suppl):S87–S96. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  5. Kongsted A, Qerama E, Kasch H, Bendix T, Bach FW, Korsholm L, Jensen TS. Neck collar, "act-as-usual" or active mobilization for whiplash injury? A randomized parallel-group trial. Spine, 2007;32(6):618–626. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. Gross A, Kay TM, Paquin JP, Blanchette S, Lalonde P, Christie T, Dupont G, Graham N, Burnie SJ, Gelley G, Goldsmith CH, Forget M, Hoving JL, Brønfort G, Santaguida PL; Cervical Overview Group. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015;(1):CD004250. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  7. Andersen LL, Kjaer M, Søgaard K, Hansen L, Kryger AI, Sjøgaard G. Effect of two contrasting types of physical exercise on chronic neck muscle pain. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2008;59(1):84–91. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  8. Walker MJ, Boyles RE, Young BA, Strunce JB, Garber MB, Whitman JM, Deyle G, Wainner RS. The effectiveness of manual physical therapy and exercise for mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine, 2008;33(22):2371–2378. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. Young IA, Michener LA, Cleland JA, Aguilera AJ, Snyder AR. Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy, 2009;89(7):632–642. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  10. Jull G, Trott P, Potter H, Zito G, Shirley D, Emberson J, Marschner I, Richardson C. A randomized controlled trial of exercise and manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache. Spine, 2002;27(17):1835–1843. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  11. Correia IMT, Ferreira AS, Gomes JFM, Reis FJJ, Nogueira LAC, Meziat-Filho N. Cervical flexion posture during smartphone use was not a risk factor for neck pain, but low sleep quality and insufficient levels of physical activity were. A longitudinal investigation. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 2025;29(6):101258. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  12. Mendes LP, Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes C, Pontes-Silva A, Barreto FS, Pinheiro JS, da Silva ACB, de Oliveira Pires F, da Cunha Leal P, Avila MA, Dibai-Filho AV. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in chronic neck pain patients (TSK-neck): structural and construct validity and reliability in a Brazilian population. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2024;25(1):151. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  13. Dirito AM, Abichandani D, Jadhakhan F, Falla D. The effects of exercise on neuromuscular function in people with chronic neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2024;19(12):e0315817. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  14. Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2017;47(7):A1–A83. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov